Yes, that's right, the Harvard that's pronounced "Haaaaaaarvurde" (the 'e' is silent).
I just spent the weekend in Cambridge, Massachusetts, at Harvard University presenting at the "Reconsidering Caribbean Diaspora" Graduate Student Conference.
I, along with Anthony Morgan (McGill) and Jodie Glean (Concordia), were the only Canadian representatives (and represented this country extremely well) at the conference and were on the "Understanding the Caribbean-Canadian Diaspora". We prepared, worked well together, complimented each other, and set the stage for other young Black Canadian scholars to keep on pushing the intellectual boundaries at these Ivy League institutions.
Here are some photos and a copy of the paper I presented (the presentation version - read it aloud and the "pause"s make sense).
I just spent the weekend in Cambridge, Massachusetts, at Harvard University presenting at the "Reconsidering Caribbean Diaspora" Graduate Student Conference.
I, along with Anthony Morgan (McGill) and Jodie Glean (Concordia), were the only Canadian representatives (and represented this country extremely well) at the conference and were on the "Understanding the Caribbean-Canadian Diaspora". We prepared, worked well together, complimented each other, and set the stage for other young Black Canadian scholars to keep on pushing the intellectual boundaries at these Ivy League institutions.
Here are some photos and a copy of the paper I presented (the presentation version - read it aloud and the "pause"s make sense).
The conference was held at the Barker Center (can spell it "er" cause it's in the US)
Ya, that's a tree in a pit. I assume there's some kind of historical significance cause this school dates back to the 1630s, but I figure it's where they throw stupid people that failed exams and those that didn't have their ascot matching their argyle socks.
For the Obama fans
I love the suit.
Outside Adams House.
Evening out at Harvard: Christopher, Shane, Anthony, Nydia
And the paper:
No, We Can’t:
Black West Indians and Canadian Political Culture
Paper
Presentation
The
Canadian multicultural myth of equality was designed to subdue, and marginalize
to the periphery, politicized Black West Indian and Visible Minority groups in
Canada. These racialized groups were
forced to accept the dominant rhetoric of Canadian multiculturalism policy
established in 1971, which reinforced and maintained White charter group
authority in Canadian society; Canada is officially multicultural insofar that foreign
cultures, and people, fit within the English-French hegemonic framework. The “Other” – the multi-racial, multi-ethnic,
and multi-religious minority – must conform to the established, but obfuscated
norms, of “Canadian” culture.
The following presentation will
argue how immigrant Blacks – of West Indian heritage, and for the purposes of
this paper, I use Blacks and Black West Indians interchangeably – faced
systemic barriers to their inclusion in the Canadian political process and
Canadian political culture. I contend
that these barriers were institutionalized, politicized, and ideological;
ostensibly altruistic ideals of inclusion were means for exclusion. Multiculturalism policy marginalized Black
political agency.
That being said, this presentation
is an on-going dialogue; one that raises contentious and emotional debate. We, as Canadians, must acknowledge the
positive attributes of Canadian multiculturalism. Once the Multiculturalism Act became law,
July 21st, 1988, it promoted the “full and equitable participation
of individuals and communities” in Canadian society, and the Act was to assist in
“the elimination of any barrier” to integration. While it only “promotes” and “assists” in
collective group participation in Canadian society, the Act ensures “that all
individuals receive equal treatment and equal protection under the law, while
respecting and valuing their diversity”.[1] Along with the guarantees of the 1982
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, all Canadian citizens, irrespective of
race, have the right to vote, and participate in the political process.
This analysis creates further
discussion and future scholarship for whether Black West Indian immigrants are
excluded from the political process, or if the “Black class” is apolitical.[2] I argue that Canadian society accepted Black
West Indians on an individual basis if they did not threaten the dominant English-French
charter members; however, the ideology of Blackness, and the threat of an
influential and visible “Black class”, curtailed Black West Indian and Black
ethnic progress in Canada. One of the
biggest barriers to Black West Indian political participation is Canadian
society’s reluctance to accept them – as a racialized group – as equal partners
in the Canadian mosaic.
This presentation
highlights that the individual Black West Indian, specifically Ovid Jackson,
has found success politically – albeit once he denounced his Black identity – but
this has not translated to group success.
Until this acceptance takes place, Black West Indians will remain on the
periphery. An influential Black Canadian
political class and leadership are hamstrung by their codification as perpetual
immigrants due to their skin colour and racialization by Canadian institutions
and an exclusionary multiculturalism policy.[3]
PAUSE
The
transnational habitus of the new mass
wave of Black West Indian immigrants between the 1970s and 1990s, brought local
political practices, attitudes, and ideologies.
Coming from a British parliamentary and democratic society, one which
was rooted in the Caribbean much longer than in Canada, Black West Indians could
easily adapt to Canada’s liberal democracy.
Yet, the liberal democratic and multicultural system was designed on the
basis of inequality; they were not accepted as immigrants to change the system,
but to work within it, and abide by and assimilate to the English and French
institutional structures. Canadian
multiculturalists’ appeals of integration did not equate to full participation
in the socio-economic and political spheres.
If Blacks were not externally integrated in society, why is one to
expect that they would become full partners in the Canadian political process?[4] Multiculturalism policy, officially
introduced in 1971, embraced an ideology that increased social, cultural, and
political inequalities.
Black West Indian Canadians and all
immigrants alike were given piecemeal toleration; the government will assist in
the maintenance of their respective cultures – resource permitting – only
within a Canadian, or a bilingual, framework.
This was an idea of a tolerable, but not fully integrationist,
multiculturalism. Immigrants were
expected to conform to the dominant Canadian White culture designed to
perpetuate social inequality. Canada’s
official policy on multiculturalism is fundamentally flawed and racism was a
real barrier to Black political participation in Canada.
Institutional
structures restricted the collective Black immigrant voice; however, individual
political and socio-economic agency existed.
The individual Black West Indian displayed industrious perseverance as
he, and she, asserted himself and herself as an equal participant in Canadian
society and its politics. Supported by
legislated terms of equality, they were not to be denied a place in the
democratic process and strove to make change from within the confines of a
White patriarchal ruling class. With
that, there must be an emphasis on the contributions of successful Black, and
specifically Black West Indian, politicians in Canada, including Ovid Jackson.
Individuals such as Jackson, controversially and contentiously, did not see the
necessity in identifying with anything other than his status as an elected
official, to serve the people that voted him in office.
Jackson,
Guyanese by birth, was a councilor in the city of Owen Sound, Ontario, between
1974 and 1982, which was followed by his eleven-year tenure as the city’s first
Black mayor.[6] He was elected Liberal Member of Parliament
for Bruce-Grey County in 1993, and re-elected in both 1997 and 2000,
respectively.[7] His election as the first Black mayor of Owen
Sound and his subsequent representation as Member of Parliament are quite
unique; the city’s population is roughly twenty-one thousand, while only one-hundred
and fifty-five – or .7 percent – of its residents identify as Black.[8] There are explicit dichotomies comparing
these figures with Toronto and Canada.
Canada’s total Black population is 2.5 percent, while Toronto is 8.4
percent, respectively.[9] Why was it that a man who represented less
than one percent of a city was able to transcend race and “Blackness” and be an
elected official for over thirty years with a career that spanned four decades? Whether you agree with him or not, Jackson
would argue that those factors are irrelevant believing that an elected
official’s race did not, and should not, determine his political policies and
political agenda.
Jackson
was not the enigmatic Black West Indian man.
Owen Sound was not a multicultural utopia. I argue that he, and Owen Sound, were not
unique or above the marginalization of the Other. The city showcased its intolerance by its
anti-French and anti-Quebecois sentiment in the mid 1990s.[10]
Jackson
did not believe that his “Blackness”, or his status as a Black West Indian
immigrant affected his run in politics.
He was a Liberal, not a Black Liberal, but a Liberal. He was the mayor of Owen Sound, not the first
Black or immigrant mayor, but the mayor.
He stated, “Once people get to know me, they don’t see me in terms of
black or white but as a concerned guy who wants to help”.[11] What Jackson failed to acknowledge was what
it meant to be no longer seen in “Terms of Black” [emphasis].
[PAUSE]
Similar
to Glean’s hypothesis, if Blacks were deliberately erased from the Canadian
historical narrative, how does a Black Canadian, specifically a politician,
present himself or herself to non-Black constituents? Can Black Canadians learn from Black
Americans?
[PAUSE]
I
argue that this initial perception of Black identity by mainstream Canadian
society, despite the supposed equalizing virtues of multiculturalism, was what
inhibited Blacks from their full political participation in society. If Black West Indians are not given the
opportunity to succeed, and if their “Blackness” continues to deny them such an
opportunity, the “Black class” in Canada will continue in its apathy towards
Canadian politics. However, Jackson,
Rosemary Brown, Howard McCurdy, Lincoln Alexander, and other Black West Indian-Canadian
politicians, past and present, represent the success and political aptitude of
Black politicians in Canada.
Conclusion
Despite the flaws in Canada’s politicized multiculturalism and
White dominated political culture, individual Black West Indian immigrants did contribute to Canada’s political system,
and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Multiculturalism Act legally
protected their rights to participate as equals. The future challenge is whether Black West
Indian-Canadians and all Black ethnic groups in Canada can unite as a cohesive
and influential political group.
We must remember the 1969 Sir George
Williams affair and the militant activism of West Indians against institutional
racism. We must acknowledge those
involved in their Occupy Movement; the late Roosevelt Douglas, who became Prime
Minister of Dominica, and Barbadian born Anne Cools who became Canada’s first Black
senator in 1984 and North America’s first Black female senator.
[PAUSE]
But
[PAUSE] the dominant fractions in
Canadian society have equal responsibility in this movement for change and
equality as the process must come from the true recognition of equality by
mainstream society. That being said,
Black West Indians must also acknowledge, and accept Black ethnic and national
difference. Black West Indians, and
their second-generation children, must continue to challenge societal and
political inequities, capitalize on any and all opportunities for
socio-economic advancement, and benefit from the positive aspects of official
Canadian multiculturalism policy.
[1] Canadian
Multiculturalism Act, R.S.C., 1985, c.24 (4th Supp.) [1988, c.31,
assented to 21st July, 1988].
[2] The “Black class” is a homogenous and monolithic group of Black
people in Canada, irrespective of ethnicity or country of origin. For the purpose of this paper the “Black
class” will be one group in society, but it is understood that there are a
multitude of Black ethnicities in Canada.
Nevertheless, this paper will contend that race and class are conflated
terms in Canadian society. One’s race is
synonymous with one’s position on the societal hierarchy.
[3] See Robin Winks for
his interpretation of Black leadership in Canada and why Black Canadians have
not enjoyed the same measures of socio-economic access as African-Americans. Robin Winks, The Blacks in Canada: A History (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s
University Press, 1971).
[4] To be internally integrated into a society, an immigrant must
assimilate to the dominant Canadian culture.
External integration refers to the dominant society accepting an
immigrant or visible minority as a Canadian and no longer the Other.
[5] Mass West Indian immigration, in the latter half of the twentieth
century, precipitated the inception of Black community support groups.
[6] “Ovid Jackson,” Parliament of Canada, accessed July 5th,
2012,
http://www.parl.gc.ca/MembersOfParliament/ProfileMP.aspx?Key=68600&SubSubject=1006&Language=E.
[7] “Members of Parliament Representing the County of Bruce 1867-2008,”
Bruce County Historical Society, accessed July 9, 2012,
http://www.brucecountyhistory.on.ca/history/politicalhistory.html. As a Liberal MP, Jackson acted as
Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Treasury Board, 1996-1998 and
Chairperson on the Standing Committee on Transport and Government Operations,
2001-2002. He was also a member of such
committees as: Transport and Government Operations; Standing Committee on
Health, SC on Natural Resources and Government Operations;
Subcommittee on Bill C-35, Department of Citizenship and Immigration Act, of
the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration; “Ovid Jackson,”
Parliament of Canada.
[8] Total population of Owen Sound: 20 895. Total population of Visible Minorities: 645
or 3% of Owen Sound’s total population.
The Employment Equity Act describes a visible minority as “persons,
other than Aboriginal peoples, who are non-Caucasian in race or non-white in
colour”. “Ethnocultural Portrait of
Canada Highlight Tables, 2006 Census,” statcan.gc.ca, last modified October 10,
2006,
http://www12.statcan.ca/census-recensement/2006/dp-pd/hlt/97-562/pages/page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo=CMA&Code=35&Table=1&Data=Count&StartRec=26&Sort=2&Display=Page&CSDFilter=5000.
[9] “Ethnocultural Portrait of Canada,” statcan.gc.ca.
[10] A house with a Quebec flag was egged, insults were written on its
doors, and the owner’s cat was shaved.
Jackson defended Owen Sound arguing that it was an isolated incident and
the city is not intolerant. “Town Not
Intolerant,” Globe and Mail, May 16,
1995. For more information on the long
history of Blacks in Owen Sound, and its involvement in the Underground
Railroad, see http://www.osblackhistory.com/.
[11] Plattel, “Black Mayor.”
lol ascots and argyle socks.
ReplyDeletelmao @ the tree pit joke! Im so proud Chris!
ReplyDeleteI wonder what that pit is all about for real. And thanks thanks!
ReplyDelete