Is it historically accurate? Yes.
Does Chiwetel Ejiofor deliver a first class performance? Yes.
Is it a good great film?
Yes.
Does Steve McQueen direct the history as representative of the past, present, and
future? Yes.
Will it win an Oscar? Yes. And here’s why.
I was lucky enough to get invited to the final screening of 12 Years a Slave at the Toronto International Film Festival over the weekend at the Elgin Theatre with 1,499
other moviegoers/film buffs/hot-to-trotters and at least one Django Unchained loyalist (moi).
I wasn’t disappointed.
I thought about doing a brief synopsis as is the custom for movie
reviews, then I realized there’s no point.
The movie is about slavery. This ain't fiction. It's history. Period. Fullstop. Next question.
Ok, that description may be a little too simplistic. Yes, the movie is based on Free man kidnapped
into slavery in 1841, Solomon Northup and his 1853 book, Twelve Years a Slave. It’s a
winding tale of how “(un)free” it was for all Blacks in the United States even
in the “free” Northern States. And this
was well before the Fugitive Slave Act
of 1850 and the Dred Scott Decision
in 1857.
Black equaled slave.
Period. Fullstop. Next question.
Unlike Django, this movie will win Best Picture because it doesn’t make
White audiences uncomfortable. Yes, the
word “nigger” is used throughout, but there isn’t the Tarantino shoot ‘em up
violence epitomized with a Black hero winning and effectually becoming the
first true Black superhero of the 21st century.
White people don’t have to question their own historical existence, but
(women especially) are emotionally intertwined with Lupita Nyong’o’s character
Patsey.
While Solomon’s narrative is tragic and Ejiofor’s performance carries
the movie, Patsey’s story is horrific and Nyong'o's performance is haunting.
If someone is to win an Oscar, it should be Nyong’o for Best Supporting
Actress. The scene where she begs
Solomon to kill her because she can’t escape the sexual, emotional, mental, and
psychological brutality suffered by millions of enslaved Black women throughout
the Americas makes you realize that the penis cut deeper than the whip. And the wounds inflicted by the former have
yet to heal.
The White-Black female dynamic in slavery should be explored further in
another movie. On one hand you had White
women (in this case the slave owner’s wife, Mary Epps) who many would argue
were victims of the institution themselves.
On the other hand, you had Black women who were sexually exploited,
victimized, and brutalized by male slave owners. These men profited from their sexual
deviance as they owned the production and reproduction of their female
slaves. The Black women subsequently faced
the wrath of the slave owning wife because “he loved his Black slave and he
didn’t love her.”
I could go on and on for days about this, but go and watch the movie when
it’s released in October and see for yourself.
Better yet, pick up a book and read for yourself. A good start (and short, it’s only 143 pages)
on Black female exploitation is Melton A. McLaurin’s true story, Celia, A Slave.
“The sexual politics of slavery in the antebellum South are perhaps
most clearly revealed by the fact that recorded cases of rape of female slaves
are virtually non-existent.” (Page
113.)
Makes you wonder how they’ve got so many light-skinned Black and
dark-skinned White people in the US, eh?
Maybe that’s how Thomas Jefferson defined “freedom.”
See a link to the TIFF press conference here.
"The penis cut deeper than the whip."
ReplyDeleteThat is a haunting line. Can't wait to see the movie with all the rest of the pedestrian folk.
I call an Oscar win from now.
ReplyDelete